“Why do you assume her choice is going to be to abort”
Because everything you have posted is giving the WOMAN the right to chose what she wants to do with the baby. You have never mentioned the baby’s “right” to live. So if the woman is the only one with a right to chose whatever she wants for “her body” (ignoring the baby’s basic right to live”0, she can certainly chose to kill the baby.
For me no person has the right to take another’s when that person has done them no harm. The way the child was conceived is irrelevant. It has the same right to live as the rest of us.
So let me see if I understand this.
You are saying that the reason you assume her choice is going to be abort is because of what I have said in these posts in this thread on freerepublic...
Let's have a reality check. Reality in America 2014 is that the baby doesn't have a right to live unless the mother gives the baby a right to live by consenting to its birth.
Is that correct? Would you not agree that is a correct assessment of reality in America 2014?
"For me no person has the right to take another’s when that person has done them no harm. The way the child was conceived is irrelevant. It has the same right to live as the rest of us."
That a very interesting ideal, and certainly one I support, however it is not reality in America in 2014, is it? A person most certainly does have the right to do exactly that
So how do you intend to effectively address that right? What is your OODA on that situation? I certainly HOPE that in your case it's something more than HOPING AND PRAYING, because that isn't going to accomplish your goal, which is why I listed the only viable strategy to accomplish that goal, and for doing so, I am called pro-abortion ;/