Abortion is murder. Makes no difference how the pregnancy occurred. The writer of this article is lying proof of the argument against murdering a child because of a rape.
It has always amazed me that some people call themselves pro-life, but in the case of rape would kill the baby and let the rapist live? How much sense does that make?
George HW Bush was the republican most responsible for getting the other RINOs to have an abortion exception for rape and incest. Like the rest of the Bushes he was a pro-abortion moderate. When Ronald Reagan picked him as his running mate Reagan told him he had change his view on abortion. Then Bush started saying he was “pro-life” but with exceptions for rape and incest and “life of the mother”. In no time at all this because the official stance of the GOP moderates, or RINOs, or whatever you want to call the liberal wing of the GOP. It was Bush the Younger’s stance, Mitt Romney, Bob Dole, and on down the line. It was also Rick Perry’s stance until he changed after watching a movie about a child conceived in rape. He is now for no abortions of any kind, for any reason.
Yes, I agree that abortion is murder, and I never said that I wanted the rapist to live, and I never said that I wanted to kill the baby.
Furthermore, I do not support any of the Bushes.
What is important here is how do you intend to actually effect stopping the abortions of these children of rape?
I don’t see you getting a law passed for the reasons I stated in a previous post. And even assuming you do get a law passed, I don’t see a judge letting it stand.
So, with that in mind, how do you actually intend to stop these abortions from occurring in practical terms.
What is your plan of action.
I have stated what my solution is, and for my solution I have been assailed.
What’s yours?