Frankly, your posts come across as one bound to defend Rome at any cost - to your own credibility. Like other refuted attempts, you have tried this before, but it is rendered void by the manifest fact that despite your inconsequential dismissal of the majority of Catholics, the church you defend treats them as members in life and in death. If you do not agree with her interpretation of canon law, then you may leave.
Protestants on the other-hand have no doctrine. You are on your own to interpret good from evil, and what’s right from what’s wrong. Good luck.
This also is an invalid argument, as your use of Protestantism has no meaning without a doctrinal definition of it, and providing one would negate your argument as well.
Meanwhile, as said, doctrinal unity in Rome is very limited to core truths, and much on paper, leaving much that can be subject to interpretation. Meanwhile, as said and shown , even without a universal centralized magisterium, those who are most committed to Scripture as literally being the Word of God testify to greater unity on core issues based on core truths than the majority of your members, including weekly attendees.
Thus your reactionary attempts to defend Rome continue to be an argument against her.
PWND