Actually, they taxed it. Whiskey Rebellion put down by George Washington by force.
So, they did exert controls on it.
Also, the danger of riding a horse while drunk is probably not as likely to injure others as is driving a vehicle while drunk.
Agreed. You make my point. The Whiskey Rebellion was over taxation levels. It was not over whether it should be prohibited.
Also, the danger of riding a horse while drunk is probably not as likely to injure others as is driving a vehicle while drunk.
Well, yes, but what does that have to do with prohibiting drugs or alcohol? We have laws against DUI for alcohol but alcohol itself is not prohibited.