Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

Actually, they taxed it. Whiskey Rebellion put down by George Washington by force.

So, they did exert controls on it.

Also, the danger of riding a horse while drunk is probably not as likely to injure others as is driving a vehicle while drunk.


22 posted on 02/05/2014 5:28:09 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Actually, they taxed it. Whiskey Rebellion put down by George Washington by force. So, they did exert controls on it.

Agreed. You make my point. The Whiskey Rebellion was over taxation levels. It was not over whether it should be prohibited.

Also, the danger of riding a horse while drunk is probably not as likely to injure others as is driving a vehicle while drunk.

Well, yes, but what does that have to do with prohibiting drugs or alcohol? We have laws against DUI for alcohol but alcohol itself is not prohibited.

29 posted on 02/05/2014 5:47:40 AM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson