[loveliberty2]

Thank you for posting this eloquent statement.

How will a U. S. President who uses euphemisms to describe what is clearly a denial of the right to liberty for unborn children, even those who may, accidentally, have survived attempted abortion, carry on meaningful dialogue with a Pope committed to the teachings of that One who commanded, "Suffer (allow) little children, and forbid them not . . . ."?

Coupled with the words of Psalm 139:13, the photos here speak more eloquently than words ever can.

[workerbee]

What’s so eloquent? He basically pushes more “social justice” at the expense of solid doctrine. That the average Catholic “never” hears sermons on the perversion of marriage is hardly something to boast about, and is partly why so many states are in the mess they’re in with regard to the subject. This is the kind of stuff that makes the struggling pew-sitter incredibly frustrated. Is it true naiveté or deliberate obtuseness?