What's most fascinating is that you won't defend your position with scripture but will instead depend upon the opinion of a Jew who did not believe in Jesus as the messiah.
And again, instead of mounting a scriptural defense of your position you'll quote the opinions of someone else.
To me this indicates that you can't defend your position based on scripture but instead in an effort to lend legitimacy to your opinions you rely on quoting others.
I've noticed also that in my response I based my opinion almost exclusively on scripture and absolutely proved that your positions were based on lifting verses out of context and applying your own interpretations. You neither refuted what I said nor attempted to quote other scripture that supported your position.
In other words, your can't prove a single bit of what you've asserted via scripture. That makes sense since whatever you believe is based almost entirely on tradition.