I did, in post 63:. I answered your question with a question:
"Let me ask you...what is your belief and is it built upon scripture or tradition? If it's built upon tradition then we have nothing to discuss. If it's built upon scripture then I'll be glad to contrast what you believe, based on scripture, with what I believe. Fair enough?"
Your question wasn't meant as an attempt to get an answer. It was meant as an attempt to label and demean. If you REALLY want to discuss it you would have no problem actually enunciating your belief and telling me why you believe what you do. If it's tradition, we have nothing to talk about. If it's scripture we do. If you don't want to answer fine, but don't pretend that I'm trying to avoid anything. This thread should be evidence that I'm doing no such thing.
I answered your question with a question:
***That is not answering the question.
don’t pretend that I’m trying to avoid anything. This thread should be evidence that I’m doing no such thing.
***This thread is plenty of evidence that you’re avoiding real questions. You’re pushing false teaching, heresy on FR.
The heresy razor.
What is said about one’s belief
they say-————— about our beliefs -——— about their beliefs
we say-—————— about our beliefs -——— about their beliefs
antitrinitarians say —valid; acceptable -——— Valid; “only True interpretation”
“Trinitarians say -— Valid, correct, “only True”-— Invalid, heretical
Basically, there is only one case where the heretical viewpoint is true. The best action in ALL cases is for the heretics to stop posting on Free Republic. Jesus wasn’t polite to heretics, and asking for ‘forbearance’ is asking more from FR than Christ asked of Himself.