[piusv]

I disagree with the contrast you assert. We have made that abundantly clear. Generally, a contrast is made between "the blasphemy she might have wanted to say" and "she was overshadowed with the silence of the mystery that she did not understand".

The problem is that such a contrast contains fallacies on both ends of it. Taking two false notions doesn't constitute a valid idea just because it's set up to look like a contrast.

Therefore, to continue to say "oh he's just making a contrast, why do you three have such a problem with that?" makes a mockery of the actual content. And then, to go even further and, suggest that we are liars because we don't see the valid contrast according to you just insults our intelligence, our character, and our very Catholic being. And you still don't seem to think you were wrong to call us liars.

[xzins]

So, you do see what we’re saying.

Good. After all that explaining, one would hope so.