Not just now, from post one your understanding of the homily was fantastical compared to the text available. This is why showing you patristic examples that are "even close" is not possible.
It is, of course, possible that Pope Francis will do or say something I will disagree with; I have disagreed with all the popes since Vatican II on one thing or another. However attacks from the right on Pope Francis today are a product of hysteria; it is a reaction to his distinctive style rather than the substance. This is why he says one thing and you imagine another.
Uh, the point was that you called our understanding as fantasy (and now we can add words like hysteria and imagine). Again proving that only YOU have the correct understanding (despite the fact that there are numerous folks that have concerns about Francis and his most recent comments).
This is not about his “distinctive” style (lol @ distinctive). Time will prove this out.
And with that I’m done playing this game you seem to be playing.