[CynicalBear]

>>One point that many, metmom included, will recoil at is this: arguing for sex that lacks procreative potential has supported the rise of the homosexual movement and CONTINUES to support it.<<

So those who can’t have children, who are beyond their reproductive years etc shouldn’t argue they can still have sex?

[xzins]

Procreative potential CB.

How old was Sarah when she conceived? And Rebekah?

I read an article in the paper a few month back about a woman in her 60’s who became pregnant.

Nonetheless, the logic is valid. Our arguing in favor of sex without procreative potential supports the rise and continuation of homosexuality. They need that argument since they have zero procreative potential.