Before everyone jumps down my throat, please note that this article illustrates the absurdity of liberal Jewish ecumenicism as well as the Catholic Church's anti-Semitic history. The author invokes the American Jewish Committee and "Catholic/Jewish dialogue" as the "answer" to the problem, as well as Pope Francis' non-Orthodox friend "Rabbi" Skorka.
But the most damning evidence of the ecumenical mindset is the section that condemns liberal ecumenicism with moslems even as it supports liberal ecumenicism with Jews.
The author can't seem to make up his mind. Is liberal ecumenicism a good thing, or a bad thing???
To: Zionist Conspirator
Fascinating. I read every word 30 times, discussing it with a homeless guy over wine this morning. He knew it all already and I was just his student there - me, with a PhD.
If only Bill Maher would bring up stuff like this on his show.
To: Zionist Conspirator
To say that Jews and Arabs in the Holy Land should enjoy equal rights or that the State of Israel is not impeccable and is, like all nations, capable of injustice is not to be anti-Semitic.
3 posted on
12/03/2013 10:43:31 AM PST by
Petrosius
To: Zionist Conspirator
The Italian writer Giulio Meottis decision to give his new book the title The Vatican against Israel: Jaccuse
is no coincidence.
Given that Giulio is a serial plagiarist it most likely isn't ...
4 posted on
12/03/2013 10:47:20 AM PST by
x
To: Zionist Conspirator; x; Petrosius
The Dreyfus trial was the pivotal event that turned Herzl from a Viennese intellectual into the modern Moses.
I don't think it's worthy of Herzl's legacy to equate the post-war Popes' diplomatic balancing act with the millenia of fratricide that preceded it.
5 posted on
12/03/2013 11:03:36 AM PST by
kenavi
(Debunk THIS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson