“Take it up with DA Carson, who refuted such scholarship (comparing it to a translator linking “butterfly” to dairy products) years ago.”
Why don’t you refute it? Or are you so ignorant that you can’t even give a summary of what Carson can do? In which case, are you qualified to even say that Carson refuted anything?
First, because it's already been done by an unimpeachable scholar who also happens to be Protestant.
And second, because I learned long ago not to engage in a debate with someone unable to recognize when they've lost.