You are just plain wrong.
Yep...I and most of the bible translators out there are wrong...And you are right...
Nicodemus acknowledges that the requirement is to be born a second time (again)...
Peter says we are 'born again'...
ἄνωθεν
anōthen
an'-o-then
From G507; from above; by analogy from the first; by implication anew: - from above, again, from the beginning (very first), the top.
I don't understand your fixation with this...Obviously anothen can mean from above, from the first, anew, again, from the beginning, and the top...
None of those completes the context of the narrative as well as the word again...That's why most of the 'scholars' chose again...It can mean any one of those words but 'again' fits the bill the best...
We were born once, but we must be born 'again', from above...What is your problem???
If Jesus had truly meant again He would have used "Palon."
Well tell us more, Carnac...
Words mean things, that is the problem. And it is not my problem, it the problem of those that are intellectually lazy and refuse to use precision when speaking, writing or communicating in general.