Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: steve8714
Dear steve8714,

I don't think the real question was whether Chappaquiddick Ted truly validly married Joan. It was clearly beyond him psychologically to enter into a valid marriage. One must be able to form clearly in one’s mind ideas like “monogamy,” “fidelity,” “sobriety,” “obligation,” “duty,” and “chastity” if one is to marry validly.

The REAL question was why the Church subsequently permitted him to attempt a second marriage. I have heard of annulment cases where at least one party to the putative, but ultimately declared null, marriage, was not permitted to again re-attempt sacramental marriage because of the psychological impediments that continued to exist in that party..


sitetest

21 posted on 10/16/2013 12:21:57 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
I have heard of annulment cases where at least one party to the putative, but ultimately declared null, marriage, was not permitted to again re-attempt sacramental marriage because of the psychological impediments that continued to exist in that party.

That would seem like a no-brainer. I've wondered why a person considered incompetent to receive the Sacrament of Matrimony the first time automatically becomes competent the next time ... absent a clear conversion.

29 posted on 10/16/2013 4:06:34 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("The heart of the matter is God's love. It always has been. It always will be."~Abp. Chaput)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson