Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: piusv

sorry for all that.
But what else would you expect from someone raised by wolves.

But I plan on honoring that request, sincerely.
I dont want to go back and forth with you. I will honor.

But first I wanted you to understand something that I did not write to you initially in that PM. This is essentially your fault and taking responsibility for your actions, its not me, its your statements and your ignorance of how things work here.

The Catholic Caucus is for Catholics but the R.M. has defined it as someone who accepts papal infallibility.
This was defined years ago...it is not new.

Your statements could not be clearer against Pope Francis and papal infallibility.I am sure you were not aware of the requirements of the ‘Catholic Caucus’, now you most certainly are.

So me asking you what you were(country/rock roll) was not a strategy it was just a question, as you now have a caucus to belong to.

>By the way, in case you didn’t know it, the RM also >removed “Catholic Caucus” from your thread attacking >Sedevacantism.

Yes. and he has configured a Caucus(SSPX or SV) for you also. A rejiggering of the Caucus definitions which there was only Orthodox available to you before.

I dont hate you. I just wanted a non-papist out of my Catholic Caucus thread, and you did trespass...albeit probably unknowingly, thinking you were a FR defined Catholic.


118 posted on 10/18/2013 3:54:11 PM PDT by RBStealth (--raised by wolves, disciplined and educated by nuns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RBStealth; Religion Moderator
Your understanding of SV and how it relates to papal infallibilty is incomplete/wrong, but I won't get into that here ...obviously.

Yes, I did not know about the caucuses, so I was wrong to post in your thread originally. However, you also broke the rules by writing a thread against another group and calling it Catholic Caucus (and you supposedly KNEW the rules). I have every right to respond to your attacks against SV or the SSPX or any other group you post against.

As for future posts in other threads, I will continue to point out the truth whether others like it or not. There is nothing wrong with my posts. You just don't like them/agree with them.

As for your sincerity, it's hard to believe when you write a sarcastic jab such as "But what else would you expect from someone raised by wolves". If you haven't noticed that despite how you have been treating me I've remained charitable.

I took issue with your being the one to inform me via PM and the moderator knows that. Moderating should be done by the moderator. Your PM informing me that I am not Catholic for the purposes of this forum (not thread, mind you) was a personal attack on me. Your PM was not just a "hey, my thread is a Catholic Caucus and in case you didn't realize the rules anyone who prescribes to SV or SSPX, etc is not allowed to per the forum rules". You also informed me that I have no home here. Let's face it. You didn't want me there, you wanted to make me feel ostracized, and that was your main purpose in your PM. It wasn't a very nice PM to receive at all.

From now on I do hope that no one else has to get a "I gotcha and btw you don't belong" PM from another poster. The RM really should be the one reminding/telling others what the rules are because they can remain neutral.

It's ironic though. I've never been reported by any other poster as far as I know and it's my fellow Catholics who have done so.

120 posted on 10/19/2013 5:04:26 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson