When I went to college at a Jesuit school, a priest explained it this way in theology class. The bible focuses on the “Who?” and the “Why?” of creation (the two most important questions). When we dwell on the “How?” and try to reconcile it with modern scientific theories of how things have changed over time, we’re missing the point. Scientific textbooks don’t try to answer the “Who?” and “Why?” and the bible isn’t really concerned with a scientific explanation of the “How?”. Therefore, the two sources are not in conflict with one another as some insist.
Answer me this.... Do you think the Bible was accurate when it said people lived over 900 hundred years?
Are the people who wrote it reliable?
Is the person of Jesus they wrote about a real person in history?
Which one of these do you prefer to believe?
I asked a Jesuit priest if Jesus was bodily resurrected from the dead.
He said that the disciples experienced a joyful rebound of emotions after Jesus’ death, and that was the driving force that propelled their preaching.
Beware the Jesuits.
what do you expect from a jesuit school?
They are not believers by any reasonable measure.
Nor are they well educated in Yehova’s word; they exist to deny it.