Replies

SCIENCE: Systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

The foe of theory of evolution is legitimate science, not the Bible. When Darwinism faces off against real science it always has and always will be knocked out cold.

Of the multitude of gaps, flaws and leaps of faith required to have faith in Darwinism, let’s look at just one tiny aspect of the overall picture. That is, apes turning into man. Where are all the missing links hiding? I say links because the gap between man and his supposed closest evolutionary relative can’t be bridged by a single link.

If the theory is correct, shouldn’t evidence abound? Why have the only missing links presented been man-made hoaxes? If the earth lasts another 2,000 years no “missing links” will be found because none ever existed.

When Darwinism faces off against real science it always has and always will be knocked out cold.

LOL. Really? You folks have been saying this for 150 years and yet, it still isn't true.

let’s look at just one tiny aspect of the overall picture. That is, apes turning into man.

You suffer two problems here. One, quite simply, is you seem to not know how to Google or read or visit your local natural history museum. There are hundreds of thousands of pieces of fossil evidence, showing a rather beautiful lineage to Homo sapiens. (Incidentally, even if there were none of that, DNA evidence is even stronger.)

Two, you erroneously think that human evolution involves "apes turning into man." Man is an ape. I know that is blasphemy to you, but scientific facts don't really care about your feelings or ego. Where do creationists get their flawed idea of what evolutionary theory actually states?

If the theory is correct, shouldn’t evidence abound? Why have the only missing links presented been man-made hoaxes?

Ah. I see. You've unfortunately been lied to. Sure, there have been a few hoaxes many decades ago, almost all of which were exposed by scientists, because that's how science works. How in the world have you apparently ignored the mountains of evidence that haven't been beaten to death by the AIG/ICR PR machine?