The point you keep missing is that those squabbling over the message are the very same “people of faith”.
It takes a powerless god to produce instructions full of ambiguity that its followers derive diametrically opposed interpretations from, and war against each other in their faith that they got it right while the other has it wrong, rendering the messages fully defenseless against the whims of human interpretation, as if those instructions were composed by mere humans.
Your verbose gibberish hasn’t accounted for this phenomenal failure in “divine” delivery.
“It takes a powerless god to produce instructions full of ambiguity that its followers derive diametrically opposed interpretations from, and war against each other in their faith that they got it right while the other has it wrong, rendering the messages fully defenseless against the whims of human interpretation, as if those instructions were composed by mere humans.
Your verbose gibberish hasn’t accounted for this phenomenal failure in “divine” delivery.”
These are incredibly weak arguments, and do not in any way deserve the arrogance implicit in this post. It’s not very intelligent at all. Human beings are able to dispute even the definition of what sex is, if you’re Bill Clinton, and are full of all kinds of absurd arguments and destruction of plain meanings to justify themselves. It doesn’t mean that the human language itself is incapable of giving clear meaning. It just means that human beings believe what they want, regardless of the facts.
Your failure to see that is consistent with the problem. Amazing so many stand in unity, affirming the same creed and singing the same songs that makes them an enemy of those who add to Scripture as well as who deny it, while allowing limited disagreement in other issues. But people dispute what the Constitutions means as well.
If you don’t believe there is a God why do you care what those of us who do think? And why should we care?