Once again a lame attempt to try to get us to think that Jesus changed the subject with absolutely no indication of such. What’s up with those anyway? It makes no sense other than a carnal attempt to somehow justify belief in the RCC.
>> But please allow us to believe what Jesus tells us without continually badgering us about it.<<
You can believe what you want to but when you come in here teaching error we are going to show scripture truth.
>>Once again a lame attempt to try to get us to think that Jesus changed the subject with absolutely no indication of such.<<
I am not trying to get you to think anything. I am just reiterating what Jesus clearly says; that He is the living bread that came down from heaven, that whoever eats this bread will live forever, and the bread that He will give is His flesh for the life of the world.
>>You can believe what you want to but when you come in here teaching error we are going to show scripture truth.<<
You have made it abundantly clear what you believe. The problem is that what you believe does not make sense. It just does not follow that the flesh Jesus says is of no avail is the same flesh that He says He gives for the life of the world. His flesh is not carnal, it is the bread of life that came down from heaven. This is what scripture clearly tells us. If you want to believe something different is scripture truth, fine. But what you believe is contrary to our belief, and no amount of badgering on your part will convince us otherwise. So let’s agree to disagree.
Peace
Prime example of the problems with Sola Scriptura, practiced by people with no formal training and no understanding of the Greek.