Um, no, this isn’t “Modalism” and you completely missed the essence of my argument. If you understand physics, there is a fundamental paradox of wave particle duality wherein waves are distinct from particles and yet representations of the same thing. When you do one kind of experiment, you get one answer (e.g. it is a wave). When you do another experiment, you get another wholly different answer (e.g. it is a particle). I am suggesting that fundamental paradox is somehow coupled with/related to the apparent (to us) paradox of the Holy Trinity. Waves are distinct from particles - they are not the same thing. Regarding your immature “heresy” comment: It is one thing to think you know Christianity but it is wholly another to actually practice it. Love conquers all.
Mrs Don-o was not accusing you of modalism. Look back at her comment and note to whom it is addressed. At the bottom you can see the post number she is responding to.
To both you and fella: "heresy" is not an insult. It is a descriptive category. It means "error" --- without any implication of personal belittlement or contempt. It does not mean "You're dumb, you're depraved" or any such thing.
Modalism is squarely within the list of historic heresies, as would be Arianism, Unitarianism, and-many-another-ism. Many great saints made perfectly understandable human errors in the theology department, and if they were unaware of it and not contumacious about it, it was not even a sin on their part.
I used to be attached to a whole catalogue of heresies. If I search around, I still might be able to find a few little ones around here somewhere... :o)
But I'm sorry if it came off as a hard word. You have my goodwill, believe me.
This last reply was for “fella.”