I have a suspicion that this will not be last we hear from you on your contention that there has "never been anti-Protestant bigotry on FR".
I have a suspicion that this will not be last we hear from you on your contention that there has "never been anti-Protestant bigotry on FR".
It has been silent since a RC considerately provided some candidates of anti-Protestant bigotry even here, and i offered to provide some others, which broadly describe Protestants as vandals, ignorant, biblically illiterate, typically intellectually dishonest, absolutely alien to Christianity, as a bizarre and false religion, who completely reject Christ, with no solid foundation, and unable to defend it. Which i just sent anyway by PM (check you FRmail]. And it was also shown that dsc did in fact begin the complaining.
For now we have statements absolutely disallowing Prot converts from having been devout RCs (just imagine the cries if we said the same about RCs), and inclusively claiming Protestants do not have the truth on their side, and thus they have a "neverending guilt trip." From the same poster who asserts Catholics never rant and rave [which is how he countered my statements that RCs who have much engaged in posting pro-Catholic and anti-protestant articles] and put down protestants.
That was besides engaging in mind reading, but that just goes along with it.
However, since, the absolute statement was made that "There is not and never has been a scintilla of anti-protestant bigotry on FR," then the poster must dismiss every example as not being bigotry, without manifesting a double standard, or admit he/she was wrong. Or keep silent or protest being put on trial.
Which makes the rest of the scintilla utterance fitting:
Remind me, what do we call it when someone utters a statement he knows to be false? Would that be the “L” word?