Unless the article title or content serves no theological debate purpose at all, it will not be removed on the basis that some Freepers are offended by it. Mainstream media articles can have inflammatory titles - the same is true for some historical writings, prophecies, sermons etc.
The "open" RF debate format is the only outlet to discuss such things whether pro or con.
That wasn’t the original discussion years ago. It was an acknowledgment that we would avoid flame bait in titles.
I’m certain my memory is correct on this.
But, as always, I accept your wisdom and integrity.