To: dartuser; verga
Actually the thirty volume commentary of
Cornelius a'Lapide comments on each and every verse in the Bible and has the Impimatur of the Church.
So there is in effect an authoritative interpretation of each verse in the Bible.
Now, that doesn't include the single verse taken out of context as if it's a stand alone doctrine in and of itself approach that I've seen and heard from non-Catholic authors and speakers who ignore context whenever it suits their agenda, but it is complete.
So thedre is indeed an authoritative interpretation of each verse, in context, as the verse relates to the context it's in as well as to other Scripture when there is an important connection to other Scripture as well as to the immediate context.
32 posted on
09/25/2013 12:30:11 PM PDT by
Rashputin
(Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
To: Rashputin
They are authoritative, but are not definitive. I chose my words very carefully.
35 posted on
09/25/2013 12:47:46 PM PDT by
verga
(Lasciante ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate.)
To: Rashputin
...the thirty volume commentary of Cornelius a'Lapide comments on each and every verse in the Bible and has the Impimatur of the Church. So there is in effect an authoritative interpretation of each verse in the Bible....So thedre is indeed an authoritative interpretation of each verse, in context, as the verse relates to the context it's in as well as to other Scripture when there is an important connection to other Scripture as well as to the immediate context. Interesting. In my thirteen+ years on FR, this is the first time that I've ever heard of this.
36 posted on
09/25/2013 12:47:48 PM PDT by
Alex Murphy
(Just a common, ordinary, simple savior of America's destiny.)
To: Rashputin
So Cornelius a'Lapide writes a massive volume ... including his commentary on most of scripture ... which by default must certainly contain his own interpretation of scripture ... but when I comment on why such-and-such a verse is being misused under the normal rules of the grammatical historical approach ... I am using my own private interpretation of scripture?
What made his interpretation ... not private?
37 posted on
09/25/2013 12:51:00 PM PDT by
dartuser
To: Rashputin; dartuser; verga
Actually the thirty volume commentary of Cornelius a'Lapide comments on each and every verse in the Bible and has the Impimatur of the Church. I'd be careful if I were you. Having an "Imprimatur" is not much of a guarantee that something is "authoritative" or even "official".
Imprimatur: The Permission of a bishop to print books regarding the Faith [Source: A Brief Catholic Dictionary (Boston: St Paul Catechetical Center, 1985), 15]. The Nihil obstat and Imprimatur are a declaration that a book or pamphlet is considered to be free from doctrinal or moral error. It is not implied that those who have granted the Nihil obstat and Imprimatur agree with the contents, opinions, or statements expressed. This applies only after precensorship; it is not specifically applied to the permission of a major religious superior. [Source: Robert C. Broderick, ed., The Catholic Encyclopedia Revised and Updated (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1987), p. 288.]
50 posted on
09/25/2013 9:43:25 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson