This is a Catholic explanation and it is wrong. Please consider the following scripture:
Please consider the following excerpt from Ligonier:
But if that is true, what are we to think of a passage like Romans 1:2627? The Bible defines homosexual desires as contrary to nature, not an equal alternative orientation. Homosexuality is a dishonorable passion that consumes men and women, leading to shameless behavior. The strong emotional pull of lust and the affections shared between persons in a homosexual relationship whatever those affections may be called cannot properly be called love. After all, love does not rejoice at wrongdoing (1 Cor. 13:6), and homosexuality is wrongdoing. Moreover, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah over what today would be called private decisions indicates that lust is a serious social problem.
And herein is the ultimate problem with lust: Those overcome with lust receive in themselves the due penalty for their error (Rom. 1:27) and will face the Lord as an avenger in all these things (1 Thess. 4:6). God keeps the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment, and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority (2 Peter 2:910). Lust blinds men to the fact that it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of a holy God.
BTW-Except for this one sentence I thought your article was excellent.
Did Satan’s temptations of Jesus lead to sin? You seem to be saying that temptation can lead to sin, which is what I was saying. BTW, I didn’t get my understanding of this point from the RCC; I got it from the Bible. That said, I’m glad you liked the article.