Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pgkdan

That is not a very Christian thing to say.

Anyway, St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome. The first Pope.

The Catholic Church may well have had the Shroud of Turin which may well be authentic.

This is all apologetics and there are dozens of such sites out there.


18 posted on 09/24/2013 7:32:39 AM PDT by BeadCounter (Really? Syria?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BeadCounter

It’s the truth. The author is a fool.


20 posted on 09/24/2013 7:34:57 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: BeadCounter
18 Anyway, St. Peter was the first Bishop of Rome. The first Pope.

I see this posted a lot, but was it not in reality, proclaimed after the fact, i.e., after his crucifixion? Weren't there bishops sitting in other Middle East/Mediterranean cities at the same time?, e.g., Jerusalem, Damascus, Alexandria, Byzantium, etc?

There clearly was the East-West Schism of 1053 between Rome and Constantinople. I was always under the impression that the bishops in the Eastern cities considered themselves equals. It was the Rome See that saw itself as 1st among equals and eventually supreme to all others.

The Catholic Church may well have had the Shroud of Turin which may well be authentic.

While I have been following the story of the SoT with great interest since the late 1970s, as well as the search for Noah's Ark, I have netted out in my thinking that God would not allow any such physical proof (with the obvious exemption of The Bible to survive, i.e., belief must be an act of faith.

95 posted on 09/24/2013 10:23:36 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson