Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie
You mean the FIRST one to be called SATAN by Jesus? The FIRST one who was CLEARLY in error? (2:11-14) Galatians 2:11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. What a way to START a church!

yes on both accounts, a sinner and one in error...amazing, isn't it how God works!!!even Paul, the troublemaker, became a major part of Christ's new religion.....the Lord works in mysterious ways!!!

514 posted on 09/22/2013 5:33:56 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies ]


To: terycarl; Elsie

>> “even Paul, the troublemaker, became a major part of Christ’s new religion” <<

.
Yeshua brought no “new religion.” He denounced all “religion” as from Satan, and showed us how he had fulfilled the only form of worship acceptible to Yehova.

Nothing new was needed because what Yehova had given was shown to be perfect. The only new thing is that gentiles had been openly and fully invited to share this bounty.

Paul explained it all in his letter to the Romans.

Your post proclaims exactly the reason that all catholics are utterly lost. There’re looking for something that simply is not there.


519 posted on 09/22/2013 5:45:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson