Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce; editor-surveyor
According to the definition above, most Christians should be apostles. Disciples first, then apostles as one grows in the faith.

But that is not the sense in which the NT writers used for the word *apostle*.

Acts 1:21-22 So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection.”

Nobody on the earth today can fit that qualification.

29 posted on 09/12/2013 11:08:52 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

What qualification? “become one with us”? That’s not defining themselves as anything. We should all be apostles—witnesses to His resurrection by His presence in our lives.


30 posted on 09/12/2013 11:13:09 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Nobody on the earth today can fit that qualification.

My belief is that you are correct. An Apostle of the variety you speak has to have been personally called by Jesus, chosen by Him, followed Him personally, taught directly by Him, and sent by Him to preach the gospel to initiate the process of making more disciples. A succession of disciple-taught disciples, yes! A succession of Christ-taught Apostles, no!

38 posted on 09/12/2013 11:43:07 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson