Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ravenwolf
You tried to float, "Oh,ok, you think it is blasphemy if i think Paul may have had some scriptures from the new testament?"

You can enjoy your straw to the full, I have NEVER made such an assertion. In fact, it is most likely that Paul had letters from Jerusalem which were read at gatherings, and perhaps this is what prompted him to return to Jerusalem for further clarifications from James and Peter and John. When you resort to straw assertions, attributing to someone comments which they have not made, so that you can then ridicule what you construct in straw, an agenda becomes more clear.

84 posted on 09/25/2013 5:57:24 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN; ravenwolf

Uh, just a small comment. Paul never received further clarifications from James and Peter and John. They received clarification from Paul. (Gal. 2:1-14). As a matter of fact, Peter was rebuked by Paul.(Gal. 2:11). Paul could not possibly have gotten clarifications from them, as he received his message directly from the risen Christ. Not from man, neither was he taught it by man. But only by the revelation of Jesus Christ. (Gal. 1:11,12).


85 posted on 09/25/2013 6:04:41 AM PDT by smvoice (The 2 greatest days of your life: the day you're born. And the day you discover why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

That boarders strongly to blasphemy, to try to raise argument over the Grace of God in Christ.


Here we go again.


88 posted on 09/25/2013 7:42:22 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson