Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

So why not baptize the baby? He’s an innocent who has nothing to with the issues raised by the Vicar.


7 posted on 09/09/2013 1:33:41 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
The ONLY Catholic canonical criteria that must be met are the following two things:

This is because baptism of an infant or child presupposes that the parents will raise him in the Catholic faith. The godparent(s) must be Catholic, too.

Otherwise it's a hollow, or even a hypocritical gesture. Who makes the Baptismal promises on behalf of the child? What do they mean by it--- if not that they are (or are willing to be) "conformed to Christ" in their faith and morals?

In this case, the lesbian couple went, not to the Catholic Church, but to the Church of England, and I'm in no position to say what they mean by their Baptismal promises.

24 posted on 09/09/2013 2:29:16 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("St Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. . . against the wickedness and snares of the devil.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson