[tacticalogic]

That wasn’t an attack but a conclusion based on your focus on mj users/growers.

It was explicitly about and directed to toward me, personally - not any arguments I have made. It presents claims about what my concerns and motivations are that you cannot possibly have knowlege of as fact, and is not complimentary in any imaginable way. It has every defining characteristic of a personal attack.

I have made no reference to mj users or growers, so any claims of basing a conclusion on my "focus" on those things rings hollow.

[RginTN]

You see a personal attack where none was intended.

I have concluded you want mj to be legalized...am I wrong?