The problem is not the "what", but the "how". The "status quo" you advocate is accomplished via an abuse of the Commerce Clause that is also the basis for the existence of agencies like the EPA and laws like the Assault Weapons Ban. Obamacare cannot exist without it.
It's an open-ended assumption of power with no objectivly discernible limitation. As long as questions about the Constitution return answers about the drugs it cannot be discussed, much less addressed and rectified.
The “status quo” you advocate is accomplished via an abuse of the Commerce Clause that is also the basis for the existence of agencies like the EPA and laws like the Assault Weapons Ban.
I don’t agree with this opinion.
The status quo keeps druggies a taboo.
I notice you don’t address my concerns about druggies inflicting their addiction on non-users. You’re only concerned about the druggies liberty.