I am the one pointing out that you can not take the words from one verse and use them to cancel out another.
In the verse you quote Jesus is not talking about his flesh.
To believe so is to make the horrific mashup that you so rightly objected to.
You have got to be kidding. The verse she quoted was the explanation of how the followers who left had gotten it wrong by believing that it was the flesh He was talking about when He said “eat my flesh”. He explained that it was not His real human flesh by saying “the flesh is no help at all”. Yet Catholics claim it’s the flesh in direct contradiction of Jesus own words.