[CynicalBear]

Here is the post that started this discussion.

To: CynicalBear She was the only human in the conception.

Think what you want, I really don’t care.

1,310 posted on Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:54:24 PM by Jvette

That was what you jumped in on apparently to try to prove somehow that Jesus got all of His DNA from Mary. He could not have since if He got all of His DNA from Mary He would not have been a male. That’s the “original post” we have been debating.

There, fixed it.

[verga]

I was responding to Izzy's post #1342: You are not giving God enough credit...It is impossible for a human female to get pregnant without the cooperation of a human male...But it happened... Apparently modern science has proven that that a female can not provide the necessary chromosome to create a male of the species...That chromosome had to have been provided by a human male, or God... While that flies in the face of what the Catholic religion teaches, there is no other way around it...

Therefore my response about Pathogenesis remains spot on. I am now awaiting 2 admissions of error from you and on from Izzy and metmom. I am well aware that I will never get one, but I am due them.