Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change
The treatment of the Cathars and Waldensians in France demonstrates that the charges of possible heresy in unapproved Bible translations is a circular justification. If a translation was not approved it was heretical and it was heretical for lacking approval.

Core belief of the Cathars:The idea of two Gods or principles, one being good the other evil, was central to Cathar beliefs. The good God was the God of the New Testament and the creator of the spiritual realm as opposed to the bad God who many Cathars identified as Satan creator of the physical world of the Old Testament. All visible matter was created by Satan, it was therefore tainted with sin, this even included the human body. Human souls were thought to be the genderless souls of Angels trapped within the physical creation of Satan cursed to be reincarnated until the Cathar faithful achieved salvation through a ritual called the Consolamentum.[5]

I don't think any current protestant church would agree with these beliefs.

Who were the real “heretics” since Christ never authorized Bible burning or suppression of so-called heresies by means of the sword.

I think we need to be very careful when we judge the actions of groups or individuals in the past based on mores of our time.

The Catholic Church has maintained that we hold the fullness of faith and that inherent in that is a duty to protect others from falling into heresy.

Further the Catholic Church has also always viewed itself as the "Body of Christ" and Christ did instruct His followers to take up the sword to defend themselves: Lukle 22:35 He said to them, “When I sent you forth without a money bag or a sack or sandals, were you in need of anything?” “No, nothing,” they replied.

36 He said to them,* “But now one who has a money bag should take it, and likewise a sack, and one who does not have a sword should sell his cloak and buy one.

37 For I tell you that this scripture must be fulfilled in me, namely, ‘He was counted among the wicked’; and indeed what is written about me is coming to fulfillment.”

38 Then they said, “Lord, look, there are two swords here.” But he replied, “It is enough!”*

At the time these heresies were viewed as direct assaults on the Church, the Body of Christ.

1,189 posted on 08/31/2013 5:29:53 AM PDT by verga (Liberals and protestants, not all that different if you look closely enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1183 | View Replies ]


To: verga
“I don't think any current protestant church would agree with these beliefs.”

And thus would have the right to kill those holding such beliefs?

It's mot matter of judging actions of long ago by today's standards. Stephen was murdered for his beliefs stated before the Sanhedrin. They too might argue they had a duty to stop this heresy but then as now these men were murderers and those who, like Saul, approved were just as guilty.

“Further the Catholic Church has also always viewed itself as the “Body of Christ” and Christ did instruct His followers to take up the sword to defend themselves”

Not so. When the disciples showed up with two swords Jesus said “that's enough”, and rebuked Peter for using a sword on the High Priests’ slave since Jesus could call on legions of angels for protection.

Where were swords defending James or Stephen, Peter, Paul?

“The Catholic Church has maintained that we hold the fullness of faith and that inherent in that is a duty to protect others from falling into heresy.”

The Pharisees had the same view and were willing to murder anyone who disagreed, even the resurrected Lazarus, lest the Romans come and take away their positions and nation.

1,191 posted on 08/31/2013 6:29:12 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies ]

To: verga; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...
c-y-c: Who were the real “heretics” since Christ never authorized Bible burning or suppression of so-called heresies by means of the sword.

verga: I think we need to be very careful when we judge the actions of groups or individuals in the past based on mores of our time.

The Catholic Church has maintained that we hold the fullness of faith and that inherent in that is a duty to protect others from falling into heresy.

Further the Catholic Church has also always viewed itself as the "Body of Christ" and Christ did instruct His followers to take up the sword to defend themselves: Lukle 22:35 He said to them, “When I sent you forth without a money bag or a sack or sandals, were you in need of anything?” “No, nothing,” they replied.

36 He said to them,* “But now one who has a money bag should take it, and likewise a sack, and one who does not have a sword should sell his cloak and buy one.

37 For I tell you that this scripture must be fulfilled in me, namely, ‘He was counted among the wicked’; and indeed what is written about me is coming to fulfillment.”

38 Then they said, “Lord, look, there are two swords here.” But he replied, “It is enough!”*

At the time these heresies were viewed as direct assaults on the Church, the Body of Christ.

Well, you have to read it to believe it. Catholics STILL defending and excusing the use of the sword, (IOW, murder and torture and imprisonment aka - the INquistion) against those who the Catholic church considers heretics, guilty of the *crime* of heresy against the church.

1,198 posted on 08/31/2013 8:20:12 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies ]

To: verga
Human souls were thought to be the genderless souls of Angels trapped within the physical creation of Satan cursed to be reincarnated until the Cathar faithful achieved salvation through a ritual called the Consolamentum.[5]

In other words, unsaved people were indwelt with demons...Is that so far fetched??? No doubt the Catholic religion has distorted and embellished it's history of the Cathars and other denominations who opposed the Catholic religion which the Cathars did vehemently...

The consolamentum was a spiritual baptism, as described in the New Testament, where the ritual practice of baptism by water was abrogated and baptism by fire implemented. Only a Parfait ("Perfect one") could administer the consolamentum, which meant that every new Parfait stood at the end of a chain of predecessor Parfaits linking him or her to the apostles and to Jesus himself.

It was the most significant ceremony in Cathar theology, marking the transition from ordinary believer (auditore or credente) to a Parfait, one of the elect. During the ceremony the Holy Spirit was believed to descend from heaven, and inhabit the Parfait's corporal body. It was largely because of this indwelling of the Holy Spirit that Parfaits were expected and willing to lead such ascetic lives, and why ordinary believers were prepared to "adore" them.

The ceremony was striking in its simplicity. It required no material elements such as water or anointing oil, and seems to have preserved a ceremony of the very earliest Christian Church. Cathars claimed that the the rite had been appointed by Christ, and had been handed down from generation to generation by the boni homines. For Catholics of the time, the rite was rather a mystery and their best explanation was that the Cathar rite was a distorted imitation of various Catholic rituals.

Catharism (/ˈkæθərɪzəm/; from Greek: καθαροί, katharoi, "the pure")[1] was a Christian dualist movement that thrived in some areas of Southern Europe, particularly northern Italy, northern Spain and southern France, former Occitania and Catalonia, between the 12th and 14th centuries. Cathar beliefs varied between communities because Catharism was initially taught by ascetic priests who had few set guidelines. The Cathars were a direct challenge to the Catholic Church, renouncing its practices and dismissing it outright as the Church of Satan.

There were numerous Christian groups thru out church history who practices were far closer to the scriptures than anything Catholic...They all had one thing in common...They refused to bow down to the Catholic religion and it's popes...Thus; they were branded as heretics by the Catholic religion...Their bibles were burned and they and their families were tortured and murdered if they refused to 'convert'...

These and other 'heretics' are the REAL Christians of church history...

1,199 posted on 08/31/2013 8:37:00 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson