Pelagianism takes its name from an austere monk, most likely of Irish descent, named Pelagius. He died around 418. He should not be confused with the two Popes who shared this same name. Pelagianism can simply be thought of as the self-help heresy. It essentially denies the elevation of man into the supernatural state, and denies original sin. According to Pelagians the sin of Adam affected his descendants by way of bad example only (Ott, pp. 222-3). This means that Christs saving work of redemption consists above all in His teaching and His example of virtue. For Pelagius, Jesus was just a great teacher as was Moses before Him. Furthermore, Pelagianism regarded grace as within the natural capacity of man. According to this view man has a natural capacity to live a sinless and holy life and merit eternal bliss by exercising his free will. The Pelagians believed this natural capacity was aided by external graces given to us by God
things like the Mosaic Law, the Gospel, the example of virtue set by Our Lord and His Mother and others. This means that man can achieve even the remission of his sins by his own power, by the act of turning his will away from sin. This makes Pelagianism pure naturalism. To re-capitulate, Pelagianism holds (i) that the sin of our first parents was not transmitted to their posterity; [Adams sin harmed only himself, not the human race, and children just born are in the same state as Adam before his fall.] (ii) that Christ came into the world, not to restore anything we had lost, but to set up an ideal of virtue, and so counteract the evil example of Adam; (iii) that we can, of our own natural powers, and without any internal assistance from God, [do good that is pleasing to God and thereby] merit the happiness of the Beatific Vision (cf. Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine, Archbishop Michael Sheehan, p. 456). (iv) the Law of Moses is just as good a guide to heaven as the Gospel. Finally, (v) Pelagians considered death to be natural to man and not a consequence of Adams sin. So even if Adam had not sinned, he would have died in any case.
Interesting. IMO, the only people who defend Pelagius are those who seek to rehabilitate a historically heretical theology.
Princeton theologian B. B. Warfield considered Pelagianism "the rehabilitation of that heathen view of the world," and concluded with characteristic clarity, "There are fundamentally only two doctrines of salvation: that salvation is from God, and that salvation is from ourselves. The former is the doctrine of common Christianity; the latter is the doctrine of universal heathenism."
-- from the thread Pelagianism: The Religion of Natural Man
See related threads:
Pope/Traditional groups: "Pelagian current...like turning back...! They count rosaries/Don't Laugh"Is This Good News? (RC Claim all can be saved without Jesus)Pope Francis: self-help courses can turn Catholics into PelagiansThe Pelagian Captivity of the ChurchAmerican PelagianismThe Gospel According to PelagiusPutting Confidence in the Flesh: Pelagius and the Presiding BishopAugustine & The Pelagian Controversy by Benjamin B. Warfield (1851-1921) Pelagianism: The Religion of Natural Man Augustine and Pelagius The Pelagian Captivity of the ChurchPelagius: To Demetrius (Rehabilitating Pelagius)The Life of St. Morgan of Wales AKA PelagiusThe Pelagian "Boogie Man"The Pelagian Captivity of the ChurchArminianism -- False Doctrines of the "Pope" of Modern Pelagianism