However, imagine that another observer, that was from Phrygia, was standing next to you, listening to the SAME person you were listening to, and had the same experience as you; hearing a portion of the words in HIS native tongue, while the rest was unknown to him. The possiblity of drunkeness could also be assumed by the other observer, since so much couldn’t be understood."
I believe I am beginning to understand your perspective. If it occurred the way you describe, then it is possible that there was a "gibberish" which was heard by the individuals in their own tongues. This strikes me as implausible, however. The reason this does not fit the scenario is that if each one heard one man speaking in their own language, no one would have called it "gibberish" or considered them "drunk". No one would have known the guy next to them was hearing something different than they heard.
However, consider this scenario. The men from the upper room step onto the street and begin speaking. A man from Israel who has never been to the particular village of Phrygia from which a particular pilgrim hailed, begins speaking Phrygian with the perfect accent only known to this one fellow. He knows that the man could not have possibly grown up there, since he knows everyone in the village.
Further, the rest of the crowd now hears this language and considers it a bunch of gibberish, since it is unknown to them. However, the man is told of the works of God, in particular that Jesus had bled and died as the final sacrifice for his sins. He is astonished. How could this Israeli Jew tell him, a Phrygian Jew, in perfect linguistic constructs, tones, accents and grammar this message? A miracle.
That is why an interpreter (of that language) is always needed for the broader audience to benefit from the "gift". This same view applies in all appearances of the "tongues" matters. Tragically, many believers have fallen for a fleshly experience that amps their emotions up, but doesn't represent anything biblical. Is it deadly? No. Is it profitable? No.
**The reason this does not fit the scenario is that if each one heard one man speaking in their own language, no one would have called it “gibberish” or considered them “drunk”.**
Right. That’s why I lean to the scenario of each of the 120 speaking multiple languages. While they themselves were unaware of what they were speaking out of their own mouths, the pilgrim onlookers from various countries (most likely all were familiar with the hebrew tongue), would hear something they understood, but not all, since the language would change. The onlookers could share (in hebrew) what portion they had understood. They were amazed, and some thought the 120 were ‘full of new wine’.
**However, the man is told of the works of God, in particular that Jesus had bled and died as the final sacrifice for his sins.**
The onlookers heard the 120 speak of ‘the wonderful works of God’, and in Acts 2:12, said to one another, “what meaneth this?”. Therefore, while they may have heard testamonies of the wonderful works of God, they hadn’t yet heard of the salvation through Jesus Christ; for that message was to be preached to them, and was done so promptly (vss 14-36). Peter explained to them who Jesus Christ was and is, and even made it clear (in vs 33) that Jesus Christ was the one that poured out the Spirit “which ye now see and hear”.
**Tragically, many believers have fallen for a fleshly experience that amps their emotions up, but doesn’t represent anything biblical. Is it deadly? No. Is it profitable? No.**
Are there fakers? No doubt. Are there people deceiving themselves, and possibly others? No doubt. But, Paul made it clear that there are times of edification from unknown tongues: “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh NOT unto men, but unto God: for NO man understandeth him: howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.” (1Cor 14:2). And, though a tongue might be interpretted, but no one present to interpret, Paul said such a person should “keep silence in the church”, he further said, “let him speak to himself, and to God”(14:28)(when he is not in church).
**Is it profitable?**
“He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself..”. 1Cor 14:4