Skip to comments.
Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^
| July 11, 2012
| Steve Ray
Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer
Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?
A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…
Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints cant do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!
Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?
An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the dead in Christ are those saints who have physically died. For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first (1 Thess 4:16).
THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE JESUS ALONE DOCTRINE. From some peoples point of view, people who have died are classified as dead saints, who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people dont want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, JESUS ALONE fails. If the so-called dead saints do anything then it is not JESUS ALONE, but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called dead saints are in fact not dead, but alive with God.
Dead or in paradise?
HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly dead saints who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no dead saint because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants
HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says Jesus is the god of the living. However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; He is not God of the dead but of the living.
- “God told him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, (the) God of Isaac, and (the) God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead but of the living. You are greatly misled” (Mk 12: 26-27).
Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as dead saints.
Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?
WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than dead saints who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called dead saints; not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.
SORRY LEONARD
YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument. He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun (Eccles 9:6).
When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the persons soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?
How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?
Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet (Kings 13:20-21).
Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It cant be much clearer than that!
The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ
JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE DEAD SAINTS. Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.
“Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?
This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that dead saints cant do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.
So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: CynicalBear
So you reject the Council of Nicaea as ‘paganism’?
681
posted on
07/15/2013 6:14:53 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: CynicalBear
Exactly how are they contrary to one another?
“all who wish to belong to the fold of Christ are placed under the dominion of Peter and his successors.”
This works both ways.... :)
682
posted on
07/15/2013 6:19:50 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: aMorePerfectUnion
“It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a command”
Anything that is not commanded by God is sinful?
“It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as an example”
Anything that doesn’t appear as an example in Holy scripture is sinful?
“It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a suggestion”
Anything that does not appear in Holy Scripture as a suggestion is sinful?
“It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a Christian practice”
Again - does scripture every claim that ‘unless it’s written down here - that it’s contrary to Christian practice?’
“It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a prophecy “
Unless it is prophesied, it’s sinful?
“It appears nowhere in Christian practice from the inception of the Church through 100AD”
Why is the date 100 AD significant?
683
posted on
07/15/2013 6:24:08 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: JCBreckenridge; Iscool
Romans 8:5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
684
posted on
07/15/2013 6:24:14 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: JCBreckenridge; Iscool
>>Has anyone proven that the book of mormon doesnt belong there?<<
Just the fact that you asked that question shows how ill educated about the subject you are.
685
posted on
07/15/2013 6:27:35 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: Heart-Rest; Biggirl; JCBreckenridge
As many posters have already said, Catholics do not believe that saints answer the prayers, but rather that they act as a "go-between" between other human beings and God, presenting their prayer requests to God in a better way. Completely unScriptural. No need for a saint to do this. In fact the Scriptural revelation to Paul is that the Holy Spirit does this for us.
Romans 8:26-27 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. 27And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.
The Holy Spirit even makes intercession for the saints......why would we want the saints to intercede for us? The answer is we wouldn't because there is no need to. The saints even have their hearts searched because they can't "do it in a better way." Praying to the saints is a false belief that they have more power than they actually have and puts others (some perceived saint) in front of God the Father.
Yes, God did chose humans to spread his Word and divulge Scripture via the Holy Spirit.
God often chooses mere human beings to act as "go-betweens" in the communications between God and other human beings, and anyone who would deny that would be foolishly and willfully ignorant (and wrong).
Was that strawman difficult to build? Throughout Scripture, this is demonstrated - thoroughly. However, nowhere does it say anything about praying to a saint (ie an individual in Heaven) - which is the topic at hand.
If God does choose to use mere human beings to speak to us through them (such as in the written books of the Bible), then God is obviously NOT adverse to using mere human being go-betweens in God's communications with other human beings, and actually often chooses to communicate that way (via a go-between human being).
Now, did Jesus say pray to the saints, or did He always say to pray to the Father? As in directly to the Father?
Throughout Scripture, the prophets and Biblical patriarchs prayed either directly to God, or asked a flesh and blood minister (prophet, priest, friend) to pray for them. There is not one Biblical reference of praying to a saint or anyone in the Kingdom of Heaven other than God.
Jesus was given to us to atone for our sins, and to confess/intercede on our behalf. There is no reason for a saint to do this. Why would God send his only begotten Son to intercede for us if a saint's intercession would suffice?
He provided us the law to show us what sin was, to keep His chosen people Holy (through deed, spirituality, diet etc) in preparation for the Messiah, and to show us that we need Him. He provided His prophets and the patriarchs to lead and instruct the people in the flesh. Jesus as a fisher of men, attracted the Apostles to bear Witness and document the Gospel.........there is no need for any saint or go between other than Jesus. Jesus is supposed to be our example of a Christian life.
...and even Jesus deferred that when you pray, pray thus "Our Father..." or "to the Father." Never, 'dear Saint suchandsuch, please ask God to...." Now, we are instructed to pray for one another, pray for the sick, the widow, the fatherless, etc.....but this is our earthly duty and the prayer is to "Our Father," it still doesn't say pray for each other and ask some saint to pray also.
We can pray directly to God the Father, and our only needed or directed intercession siteth on the Right Hand of God the Father in Heaven - the only begotten Son.
Praying to a saint or needing a Heavenly intercession other than Jesus is not Scriptural. In fact, it goes against Biblical teachings that Salvation and Heavenly intercession are through Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone.
Matthew 11:25-27 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight. All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.
Pretty apparent that it is only through the Son. The Son knows the Father. The Son reveals the Father. The Father through the Son. Still doesn't ay anything about any saints.
Christianity is not a chose your own adventure novel where you get to pick the wording and arrange things to mean what you want.
686
posted on
07/15/2013 6:30:05 PM PDT
by
Repeat Offender
(What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
To: JCBreckenridge
First, you’ve added no evidence that supports the truth claim you’ve made.
Second, I picked 100 AD because if it has not shown up anywhere by then, it isn’t part of Apostolic Tradition - meaning it was not passed as truth by the Apostles to the next generation.
I suggested bigger shoes for you because after a couple thousand years without a good pizza, the Saints above will be quite hungry.
687
posted on
07/15/2013 6:37:13 PM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
( “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” - Tacitus)
To: bonfire; piusv
>>Yet one or more miracles is the criteria to BECOME a saint in the Catholic church.<<
All true believers are saints in true Christianity.
The word saint comes from the Greek word hagios, which means consecrated to God, holy, sacred, pious." It is almost always used in the plural, saints.
Acts 9:13 But Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to your saints at Jerusalem.
Acts 9:32 Now as Peter went here and there among them all, he came down also to the saints who lived at Lydda.
Acts 26:10 And I did so in Jerusalem. I not only locked up many of the saints in prison after receiving authority from the chief priests, but when they were put to death I cast my vote against them.
Romans 12:13 Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality.
Romans 15:25 But now I go unto Jerusalem to minister unto the saints.
Romans 16:15 Salute Philologus, and Julia, Nereus, and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints which are with them.
Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus.
688
posted on
07/15/2013 6:38:19 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: Elsie; JCBreckenridge
>>I recall that ol' Pete was getting chastised at the time.<<
And he was called Satan also.
Matthew 16:23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get you behind me, Satan: you are an offense unto me: for you consider not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
689
posted on
07/15/2013 6:42:02 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: piusv
>>one could only pray TO the Father and not TO Jesus<<
That is after all what He commanded isnt it. Who is Jesus the intercessor and mediator too again?
690
posted on
07/15/2013 6:49:36 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: editor-surveyor
Deacons serving the syanogogue. You can't be serious. Nowhere in the New Testament, is the Christian gathering called a synagogue. Deacons (instituted in Acts 7) had NOTHING to do with hte synagogues. They were and are servants who minister to the needs of the believers.
691
posted on
07/15/2013 6:52:00 PM PDT
by
newberger
(Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
To: Elsie
...the living God which is the pillar.... A text out of context is a .....".
692
posted on
07/15/2013 6:54:08 PM PDT
by
newberger
(Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
To: JCBreckenridge; Elsie
>>Because Peter was the leader of the apostles?<<
Yeah, thats why it was James at the council in Jerusalem who said: Acts 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is,
693
posted on
07/15/2013 6:54:09 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: piusv
A Christian mystic no less! Oy vey!
694
posted on
07/15/2013 6:58:01 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
“I picked”
I see. So you’re a prophet now?
695
posted on
07/15/2013 7:02:32 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: CynicalBear
Odd that the Bishop of Jerusalem would host the Council of Jerusalem.
696
posted on
07/15/2013 7:03:03 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: CynicalBear
Isn’t it Christ who says, “whom much is given, much more expected?”
697
posted on
07/15/2013 7:03:42 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Elsie
So; how many Catholic bishops are MARRIED? Actually, being Orthodox, not Roman Catholic, I don't care to defend that church. Bishops married until the point in later centuries where the threat of corruption due to power hungry bishops being able to will property they controlled to their kids. At that point, the Church (Eastern for the most part -- Rome was more of a backwater) decided that restricting the bishops to monastics quenched that problem.
Since the Eastern Church has married priests (I am very glad for that -- we even have titles for them) I think the policy on bishops should be reversed but that would take a council.
698
posted on
07/15/2013 7:03:53 PM PDT
by
newberger
(Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
To: CynicalBear
Funny, in all your citations, none of them use the word ‘all’.
This wouldn’t be just yet another protestant interpolation?
“All true believers are saints in true Christianity”
699
posted on
07/15/2013 7:05:14 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: newberger
“At that point, the Church (Eastern for the most part — Rome was more of a backwater) decided that restricting the bishops to monastics quenched that problem.”
When did this occur?
700
posted on
07/15/2013 7:05:53 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson