Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: CynicalBear
>> “Your next questions about Christ are scurrilous. Christ was not just a man.” <<

.
They base their belief in the use of the title “Christ,” which is derived from Christos, which has always meant a man that becomes a god, while Yeshua is God who became man, and dwelt with us.

This is satan’s way of deconstruction Yeshua’s Godhood.

661 posted on 07/15/2013 5:18:00 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

As to the nicolaitan hierarchy of the RCC, I agree on those points.

I do not ascribe them to any particular individual believer.


662 posted on 07/15/2013 5:20:21 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: piusv
>> Unfortunately you cite a Bible verse referring to those who died before Christ.<<

So show me from scripture where those who passed from this life after Christ’s resurrection have an active role in what goes on here on earth. Surely you can do that if you claim something changed from Old Testament times. Book, chapter and verse please.

663 posted on 07/15/2013 5:23:19 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Hislop was debunked by other protestants about 160 years ago. Hislop has bad archaeology, bad sociology and bad theology worthy of Dan Brown himself!

“He claimed Nimrod was a big, ugly, deformed black man. His wife, Semiramis, was a beautiful white woman with blond hair and blue eyes. But she was a backslider known for her immoral lifestyle, the inventor of soprano singing and the originator of priestly celibacy.”

Hislop’s gonna need a [[citation needed]] on this.


664 posted on 07/15/2013 5:25:41 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Given the Catholic believes that their salvation is tied to the RCC is it any wonder they get their mind around the real concept of the body of Christ, the assembly of believers?


665 posted on 07/15/2013 5:26:26 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

No, Hislop has not been “debunked,” just hated by the pagan nicolaitans.

Not good company for you!


666 posted on 07/15/2013 5:27:30 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I can recall only one person in scripture (Saul) ever praying to a saint (Samuel) for help. It didn’t go very well for him.


667 posted on 07/15/2013 5:29:17 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“The subtitle for Hislop’s book is “The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife.” Yet when I went to reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica, The Americana, The Jewish Encyclopædia, The Catholic Encyclopædia, The Worldbook Encyclopædia - carefully reading their articles on “Nimrod” and “Semiramis” - not one said anything about Nimrod and Semiramis being husband and wife. They did not even live in the same century. Nor is there any basis for Semiramis being the mother of Tammuz.”

In short Hislop is a fabricator.

You deserve better than to fall to a liar.


668 posted on 07/15/2013 5:29:48 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“Catholic believes that their salvation is tied to the RCC”

That’s gonna get a [[citation needed]].


669 posted on 07/15/2013 5:30:47 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
>> Sure, we’ll go with the Roman Catholic church... when do you believe it formed?<<

Well, let’s just say that your contention that it started with Peter and Christ couldn’t possibly be true. Here’s a hint for you. It’s called the Roman Catholic Church. AKA the church started by Romans. Incorporating many of the pagan beliefs, practices, and vestments of the Roman pagan religions.

670 posted on 07/15/2013 5:31:15 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Just an hour ago, I was rushing to the station when I heard two women talking in front of a store downtown. One, looking like a homeless person, but well maintained, said to the other “The Bible is the most edited book in history!”. That, if true, and I believe it is, should put an end to these fruitless debates that have persuaded no one, and only satisfied the evil agenda of the self-loving haters of Catholicism.


671 posted on 07/15/2013 5:31:52 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

You are correct...but solutions for the amount of ignorance you are dealing with cannot be found in just a day or two...let alone on a forum thread.

Sigh...


672 posted on 07/15/2013 5:32:26 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“Well, let’s just say that your contention that it started with Peter and Christ couldn’t possibly be true. Here’s a hint for you. It’s called the Roman Catholic Church. AKA the church started by Romans. Incorporating many of the pagan beliefs, practices, and vestments of the Roman pagan religions.”

I notice you failed to answer the question.

When do you believe the Roman Catholic church formed?


673 posted on 07/15/2013 5:36:19 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Don’t make this thread about me.


674 posted on 07/15/2013 5:50:06 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Well, here’s one.

it is certain that it is necessary for all mankind to belong to this Church for salvation. [http://www.mycatholicsource.com/mcs/nc/must_i_be_catholic_to_be_saved.htm] Here’s another.

"Now, therefore, we declare, say, define, and pronounce that for every human creature it is altogether necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman pontiff." Unam Sanctam, issued in 1302 by Pope Boniface VIII

That one is pretty definitive for Catholics it seems to me. I do believe that was an infallible pronouncement as well was it not?

Need more or is that enough [[citation]] for ya?

675 posted on 07/15/2013 5:51:16 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I guess the answer to the question, “does the church of presently no screen name” have an address - is no. Thank you.


676 posted on 07/15/2013 5:51:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Question, do Catholics regard that site as the definitive source for Catholic teachings, or do they regard this one as the definitive source?

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM

As for what the Catholic church teaches on this particular teaching, I suggest consulting:

http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html

Hey there’s that whole ‘vatican.va’ site. Maybe that’s where you can find Catholic stuff. Who knew.

“The Church recognizes that in many ways she is linked with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter”

“Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience”

And there you go. Question Asked. Question Answered.
“Likewise we can say that in some real way they are joined with us in the Holy Spirit, for to them too He gives His gifts and graces whereby He is operative among them with His sanctifying power.”


677 posted on 07/15/2013 5:59:31 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Well, it was in 384 A.D. when Siricius (384-399) became the first Roman Bishop to call himself “Pontifex Maximus” and the first time “POPE” was a title. Constantine “legalized” Christianity with the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 but one could resonably say it really started as the RCC in A.D. 325 when Constantice called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify all the Roman religions. The formal combining of paganism and Christianity was fully embraced at that time and has continued to this day in the RCC.


678 posted on 07/15/2013 6:09:35 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

So the infallible bull by Pope Boniface VIII wasn’t so infallible after all? Bwahahahaha! Catholics are a funny lot.


679 posted on 07/15/2013 6:13:00 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
JC,
It is not a Christian practice:

It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a command
It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as an example
It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a suggestion
It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a Christian practice
It appears nowhere in Holy Scripture as a prophecy
It appears nowhere in Christian practice from the inception of the Church through 100AD
It appears nowhere in secular writings to confirm a Christian ever did it in the early Church
It appears nowhere in art through 100AD
Christ never commanded it
The Apostles never commanded it
The Apostles never practiced it to our knowledge
Mary never practiced it to our knowledge
No Christian ever did it through 100AD to our knowledge

Against this total vacuum is your one and only argument that it was never condemned.
No where in more than 600 posts on this thread has anyone provided any support for the truth claim that it is Christian.
Zero.

If that is your standard for Christianity, your call.

By that standard, everything can be Christian.

Using your standard of "nothing-but-air-can-define-Christianity"You could put pizza in your shoe, walk on it all day, claim you are feeding the Saints in Heaven and tell us the Church Fathers never condemned it.

Using your standard, you could also begin praying to leprechauns, fairies, dwarves and elves. The Church Fathers never condemned that.

Well OK then. Carry on. Better buy some bigger shoes.

680 posted on 07/15/2013 6:14:19 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson