Skip to comments.
Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^
| July 11, 2012
| Steve Ray
Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer
Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?
A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…
Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints cant do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!
Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?
An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the dead in Christ are those saints who have physically died. For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first (1 Thess 4:16).
THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE JESUS ALONE DOCTRINE. From some peoples point of view, people who have died are classified as dead saints, who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people dont want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, JESUS ALONE fails. If the so-called dead saints do anything then it is not JESUS ALONE, but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called dead saints are in fact not dead, but alive with God.
Dead or in paradise?
HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly dead saints who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no dead saint because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants
HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says Jesus is the god of the living. However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; He is not God of the dead but of the living.
- “God told him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, (the) God of Isaac, and (the) God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead but of the living. You are greatly misled” (Mk 12: 26-27).
Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as dead saints.
Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?
WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than dead saints who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called dead saints; not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.
SORRY LEONARD
YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument. He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun (Eccles 9:6).
When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the persons soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?
How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?
Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet (Kings 13:20-21).
Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It cant be much clearer than that!
The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ
JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE DEAD SAINTS. Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.
“Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?
This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that dead saints cant do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.
So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: JCBreckenridge
“Right, a coincidence with 100 percent congruence.”
You can play the Sophist all you like, but the fact is Jerome understood the Jewish system, and so his opinion was vastly greater than simply lacking a copy in Hebrew. If he thought he had a copy of something that the Jews accepted as scripture, though not in Hebrew, he probably would have used it. Josephus and the Jews essentially give the same opinion as he does, and that’s the real 100 percent congruence.
To: NYer
Do you get the gold star for Most Popular Thread of the Day??
I'm not even loing to bother wading in here... :o/
262
posted on
07/14/2013 5:57:53 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Justice and judgment are the foundation of His throne." Psalm 89:14)
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Last I checked the Septuagint was written by Jews...
Again, the division is a linguistic division between the hebrew and the greek and Jerome considered hebrew originals to be more superior than the Greek.
263
posted on
07/14/2013 5:57:54 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: JCBreckenridge
>>If its not the Catholic church, who is it?<<
It really doesnt surprise me that you dont know.
Psalm 18:31, "And who is a rock, except our God."
Isaiah 44:8, "Is there any God besides Me, or is there any other Rock? I know of none."
Rom. 9:33, "Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, and he who believes in Him will not be disappointed."
1 Cor. 3:11, "For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ,"
264
posted on
07/14/2013 5:59:20 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: Revolting cat!
Non hordeum
non frumentum!
To: CynicalBear
Ok, so which church gets the official stamp of CB’s approval as being 100 percent Jesus filled?
266
posted on
07/14/2013 6:00:41 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Paisan
Isaiah 44:8, "Is there any God besides Me, or is there any other Rock? I know of none."
267
posted on
07/14/2013 6:00:41 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: JCBreckenridge
“That Origen has too many books is still not the same as the modern canon. Is my point really that difficult to grasp?”
Except that Origen himself even qualifies his statements when he refers to them, and only speaks securely on the standard New Testament canon which had the most support. If we took your logic seriously that we needed Rome to figure out what is in the scripture, as opposed to what was accepted by the majority, then we would have to believe that the RCC with divine authority kept out the epistle to the Hebrews, and then re-instated it by divine authority at another time. I’d much rather believe that it is God who is the one truly preserving these works, despite fickle Rome and its teachings.
To: Jim Noble
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
269
posted on
07/14/2013 6:04:06 PM PDT
by
Rodm
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
“If we took your logic seriously that we needed Rome to figure out what is in the scripture.”
The conclusion follows from the premises.
Again, Origen considers many books not in the canon today as ‘divinely inspired’, which is the exact same criteria that you use. So by your standards, Origen has too many books.
“then we would have to believe that the RCC with divine authority kept out the epistle to the Hebrews”
[[citation needed]].
270
posted on
07/14/2013 6:04:54 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Persevero
Saul got in trouble for (a) visiting a witch; (b) conjuring, via the witch, the ghost of Samuel (not Elijah, who wouldn’t be born for another 400 years); for the purpose of (c) telling Saul’s fortune. So he had three strikes against him, none of which were merely for communicating with Samuel. If any sort of communication with the dead were evil, Jesus set a terribly bad example for us by doing it himself in the presence of his three principle disciples.
271
posted on
07/14/2013 6:05:58 PM PDT
by
Campion
("Social justice" begins in the womb)
To: Salvation
Have you forgotten her last words in the Bible? Do whatever he tells you. Ok, then where did Jesus tell us to pray to dead people and why don't Catholics only pray to the Father as Jesus taught?
272
posted on
07/14/2013 6:06:45 PM PDT
by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: JCBreckenridge
“Last I checked the Septuagint was written by Jews...”
Last I checked, I already corrected you by pointing out that the myth of the creation of the LXX only includes the translation of the Books of Moses as being sanctioned by the Jewish authorities. The rest was translated or put together at unknown times, by unknown people, and the only copies we have of the LXX today are Christian copies with varying books within them starting in the 4th or 5th centuries. But by then we already had Jerome giving his historical reasons for what is and isn’t scripture, and lots of explanations for why some books are included, though they are not actually considered scripture. For example, the Epistle of Barnabas was considered useful for edification, but not for confirmation of doctrine. Maccabees was included, but was called by Pope Gregory “non canonical,” but “useful for the edification of the people.”
“Jerome considered hebrew originals to be more superior than the Greek.”
Well, of course. Why wouldn’t you want the original over a Greek copy? But there is no question that he rejected Tobith, Judith and such, because the Jews also did not regard them, as seen in his explanation of the Jewish division of the scripture.
To: JCBreckenridge
>> Ok, so which church gets the official stamp of CBs approval as being 100 percent Jesus filled?<<
Just your question indicates to me that you dont even understand what the assembly of Christians really is.
The assembly I belong to is much older than the RCC. It was started by Christ and the apostles.
Romans 16:5 Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my well-beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.
Colossians 4:15 Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea, and Nymphas, and the church which is in his house.
Philemon 1:2 And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellowsoldier, and to the church in thy house:
We see the RCC which was established thousands of years later this way.
Romans 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. 18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
The self aggrandizing leadership in many organized religions today is not what God ordained.
1 Corinthians 1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: 29 That no flesh should glory in his presence. You see, our way is much, much older than the apostate RCC organization and survived despite the evil oppression and persecution of the RCC. We dont set up idols or revere mere men.
2 Corinthians 4:5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.
>>Tell me, what church do you go to?<<
Its time we get off this Catholic Protestant meme and see what scripture says. I couldnt care less which religion someone claims to be or what supposed church group they belong to. Either they follow what scripture says and put their full faith in Christ alone or they dont.
Get this straight. Im not a Protestant, Catholic, or any other moniker people like to attach to either themselves or others.
Let it be known that I am born again follower of Christ. A member of His universal world wide church called The Bride of Christ.
1 Peter 2: 9 But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.
274
posted on
07/14/2013 6:07:26 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: JCBreckenridge
“[[citation needed]].”
For the second time, it’s already been cited in this thread. Your constant sophistry and trolling knows no bounds.
To: Salvation; SumProVita; Kenny Bunk
Jerome finished his work in AD 405 (
Vulgate). "Clementine" refers to the revisions promulgated by Pope Clement VIII (15921605).
276
posted on
07/14/2013 6:09:00 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: Paisan
There would be a church because JESUS is the cornerstone, not Peter.
Petra Peter rock
Matthew 16:18 - http://bible.cc/matthew/16-18.htm
Jesus said that Peter was *petros*(masculine) and that on this *petra*(feminine) He would build His church.
Greek: 4074 Pétros (a masculine noun) properly, a stone (pebble), such as a small rock found along a pathway. 4074 /Pétros (small stone) then stands in contrast to 4073 /pétra (cliff, boulder, Abbott-Smith).
4074 (Pétros) is an isolated rock and 4073 (pétra) is a cliff (TDNT, 3, 100). 4074 (Pétros) always means a stone . . . such as a man may throw, . . . versus 4073 (pétra), a projecting rock, cliff (S. Zodhiates, Dict).
4073 pétra (a feminine noun) a mass of connected rock, which is distinct from 4074 (Pétros) which is a detached stone or boulder (A-S). 4073 (pétra) is a solid or native rock, rising up through the earth (Souter) a huge mass of rock (a boulder), such as a projecting cliff.
4073 (petra) is a projecting rock, cliff (feminine noun) . . . 4074 (petros, the masculine form) however is a stone . . . such as a man might throw (S. Zodhiates, Dict).
Its also a strange way to word the sentence that He would call Peter a rock and say that on this I will build my church instead of *on you* as would be grammatically correct in talking to a person.
There is no support from the original Greek for the idea that Jesus meant Peter to be that which He was going to build His church on. The nouns are not the same as one is feminine and the other masculine and denote different objects.
277
posted on
07/14/2013 6:10:20 PM PDT
by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: JCBreckenridge; Salvation
278
posted on
07/14/2013 6:10:39 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: NYer
In Jewish tradition (I know I know...another troll... check it out though, you’ll find it interesting...) When Caleb “...came to Hebron” [Num 13:22] it was to pray at the graves of the Fathers to give him the strength to avoid the counsel and council of the spies. In Hebron, the Cave of the Machpela, in Jewish tradition, is where Jacob and Leah, Isaac and Rebecca, Abraham and Sarah, and Adam and Chava (Eve) are burried. It’s the same cave Abraham purchases from Efron in Gen 23:10-20.
FYI our intent at any gravesite (and it is still done today, particularly before the Jewish New Year) is to ask the departed soul to intercede and beseech the Almighty, not that the departed has a power independent of G-d, G-d forbid.
I hope you have found this interesting...
To: CynicalBear
“The assembly I belong to”
Ok, what’s it called? What’s the name for it?
280
posted on
07/14/2013 6:14:05 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson