Skip to comments.
Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^
| July 11, 2012
| Steve Ray
Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer
Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?
A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…
Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints cant do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!
Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?
An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the dead in Christ are those saints who have physically died. For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first (1 Thess 4:16).
THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE JESUS ALONE DOCTRINE. From some peoples point of view, people who have died are classified as dead saints, who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people dont want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, JESUS ALONE fails. If the so-called dead saints do anything then it is not JESUS ALONE, but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called dead saints are in fact not dead, but alive with God.
Dead or in paradise?
HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly dead saints who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no dead saint because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants
HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says Jesus is the god of the living. However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; He is not God of the dead but of the living.
- “God told him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, (the) God of Isaac, and (the) God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead but of the living. You are greatly misled” (Mk 12: 26-27).
Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as dead saints.
Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?
WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than dead saints who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called dead saints; not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.
SORRY LEONARD
YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument. He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun (Eccles 9:6).
When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the persons soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?
How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?
Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet (Kings 13:20-21).
Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It cant be much clearer than that!
The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ
JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE DEAD SAINTS. Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.
“Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?
This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that dead saints cant do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.
So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Also, I think you were being asked about the complete Bible, not individual writings.
161
posted on
07/14/2013 4:46:17 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
“What lone authority even existed in the first few hundred years to make such a decision?”
Didn’t you just assert that the Apostles did exactly that?
So how do explain away Marcion? If there existed an Apostolic Canon was it lost by the mid 2nd century? Is that your claim?
162
posted on
07/14/2013 4:46:58 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
...its you who wants me to ignore the history of the first few hundred years after the Apostles.
_________________________
Straw man. I want you to ignore no such thing.
163
posted on
07/14/2013 4:47:31 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: driftdiver
Oddly enough you’ve never been bothered with ‘legitimate episcopal oversight’.
164
posted on
07/14/2013 4:47:50 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: JCBreckenridge
"If there existed a canon in Apostolic times, why would Marcion publish his canon and argue that *THIS* was the correct list of books?"
Because Marcion was a widely acknowledge heretic who said lots of heretical stuff. If you are going to use widely acknowledged heretics as evidence then no Christian theology has ever been established because there have always been heretics challenging orthodoxy as pointed out as early as the book of Jude.
To: piusv
What part of “my personal walk with Jesus” are people missing. God hears our prayers - I do not think he needs chain mail prayers.
With this idea why confess sins to a priest in private instead of the whole congregation?
lol
166
posted on
07/14/2013 4:48:23 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Iscool
Jesus Christ isn’t your religion?
167
posted on
07/14/2013 4:48:35 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: SumProVita
If you won’t accept that, then pray for The Lord to open your eyes to His truth because that is what that passage teaches. Why in the world would you need anything else when Scripture makes the man of God “perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” You’ve got to question your desire to want something more than what God said will make a man perfect. You’ve got to ask why you aren’t satisfied with His word. God says nothing more is needed, yet you can’t accept that and you desire the teachings and traditions of men. Why?
And those are rhetorical questions for you and anyone else to wrestle with. You have to do business with the triune God, not me.
To: GeronL
“With this idea why confess sins to a priest in private instead of the whole congregation?”
Great idea! You first!
169
posted on
07/14/2013 4:49:10 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: JCBreckenridge
I am lazy and depressed a lot.
Not too juicy since I am a prude
170
posted on
07/14/2013 4:51:00 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: JCBreckenridge
Well since I am a Christian and not a Catholic I’m confused as why you would think I should worry about “legitimate episcopal oversight”.
Christians don’t believe we have to rely on a man to interpret the Bible, or to understand Gods will. We have the ability to speak directly to Jesus and receive instruction through the Holy Spirit.
What does your “legitimate episcopal oversight” have to say about Catholics who support abortion, and gay marriage not to mention praying to dead people as indicated in this article?
171
posted on
07/14/2013 4:51:51 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Cousin Eddie
“The Gospels were written sometime between 60 A.D. and 100 A.D.”
This is basically a denial that the Gospels were written by the Apostles or their close associates, since most of them were dead before or at 64-65AD. Paul’s works are dated all before 60AD, and yet he quotes the Gospel of Luke. Other epistles quote each other, or are related in style or theme, all placing them as being written by the same author.
The only Gospel that could have been written after 70AD would have been John’s, since the early writers, who claimed some connection with John, mention that John took it upon himself to “finish” it with his own work.
To: Revolting cat!
Alas, there is no Latin word for popcorn! They had other types of munchies. Glis glis - roasted dormouse dipped in honey and rolled in poppyseed. Lark's tongue in aspic. That sort of thing.
To: P.O.E.
>> I ask them to pray / intercede for me.<<
Sounds like a waste of time according to scripture.
Ecclesiastes 9:5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.
As you can see Jesus instructions direct us to pray directly to the Father. Christ suffered and died to give us that benefit. There is no greater access that anyone has then those of us who believe in Him. To pray to anyone else hoping to somehow increase our access or importance is a denigration of respect for what Jesus did for us to have that right to direct access to the Father. Its a denial of what Jesus told us our right is.
174
posted on
07/14/2013 4:53:16 PM PDT
by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
To: circlecity
“Because Marcion was a widely acknowledge heretic”
Ok - again. Why would he claim that his canon was the ‘official canon’ if there existed an Apostolic canon? Marcion wasn’t stupid. At the time there was no canon. Marcion took advantage of this to publish his own!
Sorta like that Martin Luther fella, except Marcion didn’t have the chutzpah tear books he hated out. And sorta like that Mormon dude, except he didn’t invent his own Gospel.
“If you are going to use widely acknowledged heretics as evidence then no Christian theology has ever been established because there have always been heretics challenging orthodoxy”
I am arguing that at the time of Marcion there existed no apostolic canon. This is, in fact, true. The response of the Church fathers wasn’t, “you’re a moron. This is the correct list of books, begone”. Their response was, “this is a problem. We need to come up with a list of official books to counter Marcion’s teachings”.
175
posted on
07/14/2013 4:53:51 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: piusv
If we can ask sinners on Earth to pray to Jesus for us, why wouldnt we want to ask those saints already in Heaven to do the same for us?Because we watch you guys when you do it...We do not pray to aunts and uncles and brothers and sisters and ask them to perform miracles for us like you guys do with your so-called Saints...
176
posted on
07/14/2013 4:54:45 PM PDT
by
Iscool
To: CynicalBear
“neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.”
“Pray for one another” - Jesus.
177
posted on
07/14/2013 4:55:09 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Iscool
178
posted on
07/14/2013 4:55:34 PM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: .45 Long Colt
I absolutely accept what the Scripture says...but not your interpretation of it. It does not categorically state that the Bible ALONE is the sole rule of faith. That idea did not even exist until the days of Martin Luther in the 16th century.
You still have not answered my question about what is the pillar of truth for us? The Bible does tell us that...doesn’t it?
179
posted on
07/14/2013 4:55:59 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: JCBreckenridge
"This is evidence that, as of the early 4th century, there did not exist a common canon. Additional evidence for this fact can be found in the writings of the Church fathers prior to the publication of the Vulgate. So - wheres the evidence for your position? There is none."
Ah, now that you are pinned down you change your story. You said "the Vulgate published in 400 AD by Pope Damasus was the first canon with all the books." Athanasius catalogued the current canon, with all the books, well before that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson