If you're going to twist Scripture that badly, then there is no way to talk any sense into you. It does NOT say the Gospel has appeared to all men (and it hadn't at the time it was written), it says that the grace that brings salvation has appeared to all men. That is past tense, not future, it it plainly says grace, not gospel.
If you insist on holding on to your twisted view of plain scripture, then please don't reply. I'm done.
“It does NOT say the Gospel has appeared to all men (and it hadn’t at the time it was written), it says that the grace that brings salvation has appeared to all men.”
Whether you call it the Gospel of the grace of God, or just the grace of God, that it “appeared” to the damned and the elect is not debatable. You’re trying to prove so much without addressing the entirety of the scriptures, which you claimed earlier must be interpreted with the aid of those same scriptures.