Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Good piece by a Canadian pastor.
1 posted on 06/17/2013 5:43:05 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ReformationFan

This is a issue that isn’t going to be easy to sort out. Sme sex marriage isn’t going to be allowed in most of the country. What happens with DOMA in the courts will be interesting to say thje least. I can’t see any of the “red” states allowing it, but will they have to recognize it from other states? Time to dig in our heels and push back against this with all our might


2 posted on 06/17/2013 6:04:29 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

A good article. Reagan actually signed the first no-fault divorce law,

“Now, since the family and human society at large spring from marriage, these men will on no account allow matrimony to be the subject of the jurisdiction of the Church. Nay, they endeavor to deprive it of all holiness, and so bring it within the contracted sphere of those rights which, having been instituted by man, are ruled and administered by the civil jurisprudence of the community. Wherefore it necessarily follows that they attribute all power over marriage to civil rulers, and allow none whatever to the Church; and, when the Church exercises any such power, they think that she acts either by favor of the civil authority or to its injury. Now is the time, they say, for the heads of the State to vindicate their rights unflinchingly, and to do their best to settle all that relates to marriage according as to them seems good.”

—Pope Leo XIII, 1880

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_10021880_arcanum_en.html

He was writing about civil divorce and remarriage at the time. His mitre would have spun off his head if someone would have explained ‘gay marriage’ to him. To the state in the modern era, marriage is simply whatever judges, pols, or 50% +1 of the voting public thinks it is at any one time. It was always a danger, and the longer it goes on the more people are conditioned to think that marriage comes from and is defined by the state.

Freegards


3 posted on 06/17/2013 6:22:34 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

it seems very nearly inevitable that the definition will soon be expanded to include homosexual unions. And once marriage has been redefined away from the union of one man to one woman, it seems almost impossible not to see it also expand to include polygamous relationships.


Would queer marriage be alright if they promise not to legalize plural marriage? would every one be happy then?


9 posted on 06/17/2013 9:06:05 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson