well, you two have successfully hijacked the thread.
Not entirely...I suspect the thread was posted to attack Baptists. The substance of the attack is optional. What matters is the attack!
Nonsense. The point was made originally that the Southern Baptist Convention had taken the position that it was “supporting the Scouts” still. Then the question came out why they weren’t mandating or requiring this or that. A fundamental understanding of how the SBC works is required to understand why this is not so. There was no “hijacking” of anything. Sorry you weren’t paying attention. Go back and read before you attack others!