Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

I would also add that that this was not the first time that Christ upset the apple cart by changing OT thinking. He worked on the Sabbath by doing good and healing on the Sabbath. There were Jews that took issue with that and didn’t follow Him, but He didn’t change the message.

So it is with Christ’s reference to drinking His blood: it too broke with tradition. In this instance He wasn’t merely talking about animal or human blood. He was talking about His Blood. Something new and entirely different.

And yes, some Jews couldn’t handle that either...and they too walked away.

But He didn’t change the message.


63 posted on 06/02/2013 2:00:02 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

I think you are confusing ‘tradition’ with ‘law’.

The law said to keep the sabbath holy. Tradition dictated how the Jews thought that should be carried out - no healing.

It wasn’t a ‘tradition’ that said don’t drink blood, it was the law. Jesus came to fulfill the law, not to do away with it (Matthew 5:17&18).


64 posted on 06/02/2013 3:06:49 PM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson