Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop

Nature is not a mind. We have absolutely no evidence for this. In fact, this is actually a ridiculous assertion, akin to believing in a literal ‘Mother Nature’.

Besides, if he believes so-called ‘nature’ is a conscious, calculating force.... well, that sounds a whole lot like God to me.


25 posted on 05/29/2013 2:48:56 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon

[[Nature is not a mind.]] I realize that- but peopel liek demski somehow thin kit is- their hypothesis abotu how information arose is bizzare to say the least

[[Besides, if he believes so-called ‘nature’ is a conscious, calculating force.... well, that sounds a whole lot like God to me.]]

That’s why I say he misses them ark by 10 to the 2,000,000th power when the answetr is right htere in front of him


33 posted on 05/29/2013 2:53:52 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson