Replies

True to form.

But as said in response to your past recourse to the genesis fallacy, “despite your attempt to divert attention to Martin, who is just one apologist who exposes you, the fact remain that Borg presents a radical different Jesus, Spirit and gospel, as stated in posts on previous threads.

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2962210/posts?page=70#70 and http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2962210/posts?page=86#86 and other posts

By rejecting the plenary inspiration of about half of the established Scriptures and by denying core truths (including the literal atonement, as passages that refer to the body and blood of Jesus are allegorically made to refer to the “Divine Good and Divine Truth” which proceeds from his Divine Human), both of which were a result of his esoteric occultic “revelations” and his highly allegorical hermeneutic, and by making his own writings as Scripture (”I enjoy a complete inspiration”), borg moved out of the realm of NT Christianity and joins the ranks of Joseph Smith, Ellen G. White, Mary Baker Eddy and others who also claimed a whole series of ‘divine visions’ to justify their teachings.

Additional info:
http://www.ukapologetics.net/11/swedenborgianism.htm
http://www.revjonathanwayfarers.org/sborg_theo/What_is_Bible.htm
http://archive.org/details/swedenborgianis00socigoog (Swedenborgianism examined : Pond)
http://www.whatsaiththescripture.com/Fellowship/SWEDENBORGIANISM.html
http://craigwmiller.tripod.com/interest.htm (Did Emanuel Swedenborg Influence LDS Doctrine?)

Thus your attempt to use FR to propagate Borg doctrine resulted it is being negatively exposed, and will be.