They also believe that Yah'shua taught a new and different message. That is because many "christians" believe in three gods
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
They believe Yah'shua is a new god. 6 For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders ; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom,
“That is because many “christians” believe in three gods
They believe Yah’shua is a new god.
They also believe that Yah’shua taught a new and different message.
6 For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders ; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom,
shalom b’SHEM Yah’shua HaMashiach”
His “shem”, the word translated name, refers to his essential character, not just a name in the western sense. He is literally the Mighty God, the Prince of Peace, and so forth, and not just a mere name. It describes him perfectly.
On the phrase ‘Everlasting Father’ From Barnes’ commentary:
“The everlasting Father - The Chaldee renders this expression, ‘The man abiding forever.’ The Vulgate, ‘The Father of the future age.’ Lowth, ‘The Father of the everlasting age.’ Literally, it is the Father of eternity. ;by ad. The word rendered “everlasting,”’ad, properly denotes “eternity,” and is used to express “forever;” see Psa_9:6, Psa_9:19; Psa_19:10. It is often used in connection with ôlâm, thus, v’ed ôlâm, “forever and ever;” Psa_10:16; Psa_21:5; Psa_45:7. The Hebrews used the term father in a great variety of senses - as a literal father, a grandfather, an ancestor, a ruler, an instructor. The phrase may either mean the same as the Eternal Father, and the sense will be, that the Messiah will not, as must be the ease with an earthly king, however excellent, leave his people destitute after a short reign, but will rule over them and bless them forever (Hengstenberg); or it may be used in accordance with a custom usual in Hebrew and in Arabic, where he who possesses a thing is called the father of it.”
The phrase, therefore, does not say that the Father is named the Son, despite still being the Father.