>>The corollary is
In Canada - where clergy are imprisoned as result of their failure to articulate a natural rejection of homosexual behavior in non-religious terms?
Queen takes Bishop.
Oops!
2)"In Canada - where clergy are imprisoned as result of their failure to articulate a natural rejection of homosexual behavior in non-religious terms?"
I'm not quite following this. In Canada, people are imprisoned for failing to express their rejection of homosexuality? They are imprisoned for non-religious terms? (Confused pre-coffee look.) Could you explain a bit what you're referring to here?
3) Does this relate to what I said in #21? Or are you thinking of something or somebody else?
Thanks. I'd like to respond better if I could.