Is this presumed “pimping” of a particular church really at issue here? There have been other threads posted during your brief time on FR that could be described in such a manner, yet I don’t recall seeing you there.
One thing that should be clear by now, is that I am not even remotely “pimping” a particular denomination or sect. There are some with which I agree more than others. Some veer far enough away that I’ll go so far as to say that they’re no longer Christian.
I am not going to say that the OP is not Christian because I’ve never witnessed him erring upon core salvific matters, regardless of the denomination to which he presumably belongs. Upon this you and I differ, clearly.
If you wish to argue finer points of a particular denomination I strongly suggest you find someone who belongs to it. I can’t say it any more plainly.
Now, you have a good evening. This has gone on quite long enough.
“Is this presumed “pimping” of a particular church really at issue here?”
Looks like we’ve finally come full circle, so I’ll just repeat my original response to the complaints that I said anything:
“People have a right to know who it is that is offering them “edification” so as to be wary of subtle errors of groups they consider non-Christian. It’s not being rude. It’s called a disclaimer.”
There we go.