“I shall not violate the rules of the Forum by calling you an idiot. Read it again.”
So that’s your big refutation to a quote by Pope Gregory the First? Well, uh, you really got me on this one.
“So to you any invidual who is connected with the Catholic Church who produces any script, is to be taken a face value? Do you have no clue as to what the Magisterium is?”
The magisterium back then believed that the See of Peter was divided between the Bishop of Antioch, Alexandria and Rome. Thus, that is why “Pope” Gregory, whom you say is the Universal Pastor (though he himself rejected the notion of the Universal Bishop, calling it the spirit of anti-Christ) and Theodoret, a Bishop, expressed that.
If even a “Pope” and a valuable Bishop can’t be believed when he denies the Primacy of Rome, I’m not sure who we CAN believe in the Roman Catholic church.
Well, I guess they weren’t actually Roman Catholics, at least as we understand them today.
The magisterium back then believed that the See of Peter was divided between the Bishop of Antioch, Alexandria and Rome. Thus, that is why “Pope” Gregory, whom you say is the Universal Pastor (though he himself rejected the notion of the Universal Bishop, calling it the spirit of anti-Christ) and Theodoret, a Bishop, expressed that.
I never said any such thing. And you must realize that Theodoret died a century before Gregory the Great was born. Theodoret was a bishop of Syria, not a part of the Latin branch. Where do you people learn to understand history? Where do you get your history from, anyway? Wikipedia? Little coloured booklets tucked under windshield wipers whilst attending Mass?
You keep saying that I insult you and will not answer your points. You keep claiming that you make these points and don't actually make them. If you wish to engage in serious dialogue, then please do so. Until then, I regard your posts as merely frivolous and extremely antiCatholic, as well as antiChristian and completely opposed to history as we know it.